Question 1: After NetworkExtension is installed, when the software receives a pushed uninstall command, it needs to download the entire software but fails to uninstall this NetworkExtension. Are there any solutions? Question 2: How can residual, uninstalled NetworkExtensions be cleaned up when SIP (System Integrity Protection) is enabled?

com.apple.main-thread 0 StarMaker 0x5c40854 _isPlatformVersionAtLeast.cold.2 + 4425680980 1 StarMaker 0x526d278 -[FPRScreenTraceTracker displayLinkStep] + 191 (FPRScreenTraceTracker.m:191) 2 QuartzCore 0xbe924 CA::Display::DisplayLinkItem::dispatch(CA::SignPost::Interval<(CA::SignPost::CAEventCode)835322056>&) + 64 3 QuartzCore 0x9bf38 CA::Display::DisplayLink::dispatch_items(unsigned long long, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) + 880 4 QuartzCore 0xaf770 CA::Display::DisplayLink::dispatch_deferred_display_links(unsigned int) + 360 5 UIKitCore 0x7dee4 _UIUpdateSequenceRunNext + 128 6 UIKitCore 0x7d374 schedulerStepScheduledMainSectionContinue + 60 7 UpdateCycle 0x1560 UC::DriverCore::continueProcessing() + 84 8 CoreFoundation 0x164cc __CFMachPortPerform + 168 9 CoreFoundation 0x460b0 CFRUNLOOP_IS_CALLING_OUT_TO_A_SOURCE1_PERFORM_FUNCTION + 60 10 CoreFoundation 0x45fd8 __CFRunLoopDoSource1 + 508 11 CoreFoundation 0x1dc1c __CFRunLoopRun + 2168 12 CoreFoundation 0x1ca6c _CFRunLoopRunSpecificWithOptions + 532 13 GraphicsServices 0x1498 GSEventRunModal + 120 14 UIKitCore 0x9ddf8 -[UIApplication _run] + 792 15 UIKitCore 0x46e54 UIApplicationMain + 336 16 StarMaker 0x50c965c main + 18 (main.m:18) 17 ??? 0x19a9dae28 (缺少) Thread 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x67f4 __semwait_signal + 8 1 libsystem_c.dylib 0xc7e4 nanosleep + 220 2 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x1eb0f8 std::__Cr::this_thread::sleep_for(std::__Cr::chrono::duration<long long, std::__Cr::ratio<1l, 1000000000l>> const&) + 198 (pthread.h:198) 3 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x27d30 zorro::KbLog::Loop() + 88 (kblog.cc:88) 4 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x286e8 <deduplicated_symbol> + 4667967208 5 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x444c _pthread_start + 136 6 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x8cc thread_start + 8 Thread 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x67f4 __semwait_signal + 8 1 libsystem_c.dylib 0xc7e4 nanosleep + 220 2 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x1eb0f8 std::__Cr::this_thread::sleep_for(std::__Cr::chrono::duration<long long, std::__Cr::ratio<1l, 1000000000l>> const&) + 198 (pthread.h:198) 3 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x19a4e4 zorro::ZkbLog::Loop() + 157 (zlog.cc:157) 4 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x286e8 <deduplicated_symbol> + 4667967208 5 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x444c _pthread_start + 136 6 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x8cc thread_start + 8 Thread 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x67f4 __semwait_signal + 8 1 libsystem_c.dylib 0xc7e4 nanosleep + 220 2 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x1eb0f8 std::__Cr::this_thread::sleep_for(std::__Cr::chrono::duration<long long, std::__Cr::ratio<1l, 1000000000l>> const&) + 198 (pthread.h:198) 3 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x19c4d8 zorro::QosManager::Loop() + 966 (string:966) 4 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x286e8 <deduplicated_symbol> + 4667967208 5 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x444c _pthread_start + 136 6 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x8cc thread_start + 8

(related post: How to optimize my app for for a carrier-provided satellite network? ) I am trying to implement an app so that it works under a carrier-provided satellite network. The app uses (AS)WebAuthenticationSession for signing in. If the app is entitled to access a satellite network, will (AS)WebAuthenticationSession work as well? How about WKWebView and SFSafariViewController? Is there a way to test(simulate) a ultra-constrained network on a device or a simulator to see the expected behavior? Thanks,

iOS 18.4 introduced some requirements on the Key Usage of 802.1x server certificates, as described here. https://support.apple.com/en-us/121158 When using TLS_ECDHE_RSA or TLS_DHE_RSA cipher suites, 802.1X server certificates containing a Key Usage extension must have Digital Signature key usage set. When using the TLS_RSA cipher suite, 802.1X server certificates containing a Key Usage extension must have Key Encipherment key usage set. It reads like the change is supposed to affect 802.1x only. However, we have found out that the new restrictions are actually imposed on all TLS connections using the Network framework, including in Safari. Unlike other certificate errors which can be either ignored by users (as in Safari) or by code (via sec_protocol_options_set_verify_block), these new ones can't. Even if passing completion(true) in the TLS verification block, the connection still ends up in waiting state with error -9830: illegal parameter. I understand that these requirements are valid ones but as a generic TLS library I also expect that Network framework could at least allow overriding the behavior. The current treatment is not consistent with those on other certificate errors. Since I can't upload certificates, here is how to reproduce a certificate that fails. Create a OpenSSL config file test.cnf [ req ] default_bits = 2048 distinguished_name = dn x509_extensions = v3_ca prompt = no [ dn ] CN = example.com [ v3_ca ] subjectKeyIdentifier = hash authorityKeyIdentifier = keyid:always,issuer basicConstraints = CA:TRUE keyUsage = critical, keyCertSign, cRLSign Generate certificate and private key openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -keyout key.pem -out cert.pem -days 365 -config test.cnf And here is the client code to test. // Target server and port let host = NWEndpoint.Host("example.com") let port = NWEndpoint.Port("443")! // Configure insecure TLS options let tlsOptions = NWProtocolTLS.Options() sec_protocol_options_set_verify_block(tlsOptions.securityProtocolOptions, { _, _, completion in // Always trust completion(true) }, DispatchQueue.global()) let params = NWParameters(tls: tlsOptions) let connection = NWConnection(host: .init(host), port: .init(rawValue: port)!, using: params) connection.stateUpdateHandler = { newState in switch newState { case .ready: print("TLS connection established") case .failed(let error): print("Connection failed: \(error)") case .cancelled: print("Connection canceled") case .preparing: print("Connection preparing") case .waiting(let error): print("Connection waiting: \(error)") case .setup: print("Connection setup") default: break } } connection.start(queue: .global()) Output Connection preparing Connection waiting: -9830: illegal parameter Previously reported as FB17099740

Summary NetworkConnection<WebSocket> in iOS 26 Network framework throws POSIXErrorCode(rawValue: 22): Invalid argument when receiving WebSocket ping (opcode 9) or pong (opcode 10) control frames. This prevents proper WebSocket keep-alive functionality. Environment iOS 26.0 (Simulator) macOS 26.1 Xcode 26.0 Note: This issue was initially discovered on iOS 26 Simulator. The same behavior was confirmed on macOS 26, suggesting a shared bug in the Network framework. The attached sample code is for macOS for easier reproduction. Description When using the new NetworkConnection<WebSocket> API introduced in iOS 26 or macOS 26, the receive() method throws EINVAL error whenever a ping or pong control frame is received from the server. This is a critical issue because: WebSocket servers commonly send ping frames to keep connections alive Clients send ping frames to verify connection health The receive callback never receives the ping/pong frame - the error occurs before the frame reaches user code Steps to Reproduce Create a WebSocket connection to any server that supports ping/pong (e.g., wss://echo.websocket.org): import Foundation import Network // MARK: - WebSocket Ping/Pong EINVAL Bug Reproduction // This sample demonstrates that NetworkConnection<WebSocket> throws EINVAL // when receiving ping or pong control frames. @main struct WebSocketPingPongBug { static func main() async { print("=== WebSocket Ping/Pong EINVAL Bug Reproduction ===\n") do { try await testPingPong() } catch { print("Test failed with error: \(error)") } } static func testPingPong() async throws { let host = "echo.websocket.org" let port: UInt16 = 443 print("Connecting to wss://\(host)...") let endpoint = NWEndpoint.hostPort( host: NWEndpoint.Host(host), port: NWEndpoint.Port(rawValue: port)! ) try await withNetworkConnection(to: endpoint, using: { WebSocket { TLS { TCP() } } }) { connection in print("Connected!\n") // Start receive loop in background let receiveTask = Task { var messageCount = 0 while !Task.isCancelled { do { let (data, metadata) = try await connection.receive() messageCount += 1 print("[\(messageCount)] Received frame - opcode: \(metadata.opcode)") if let text = String(data: data, encoding: .utf8) { print("[\(messageCount)] Content: \(text)") } else { print("[\(messageCount)] Binary data: \(data.count) bytes") } } catch let error as NWError { if case .posix(let code) = error, code == .EINVAL { print("❌ EINVAL error occurred! (POSIXErrorCode 22: Invalid argument)") print(" This is the bug - ping/pong frame caused EINVAL") // Continue to demonstrate workaround continue } print("Receive error: \(error)") break } catch { print("Receive error: \(error)") break } } } // Wait for initial message from server try await Task.sleep(for: .seconds(2)) // Test 1: Send text message (should work) print("\n--- Test 1: Sending text message ---") try await connection.send("Hello, WebSocket!") print("✅ Text message sent") try await Task.sleep(for: .seconds(1)) // Test 2: Send ping (pong response will cause EINVAL) print("\n--- Test 2: Sending ping frame ---") print("Expecting EINVAL when pong is received...") let pingMetadata = NWProtocolWebSocket.Metadata(opcode: .ping) try await connection.ping(Data()) { pingMetadata } print("✅ Ping sent, waiting for pong...") // Wait for pong response try await Task.sleep(for: .seconds(2)) // Cleanup receiveTask.cancel() print("\n=== Test Complete ===") print("If you saw 'EINVAL error occurred!' above, the bug is reproduced.") } } } The receive() call fails with error when pong arrives: ❌ EINVAL error occurred! (POSIXErrorCode 22: Invalid argument) Test Results Scenario Result Send/receive text (opcode 1) ✅ OK Client sends ping, receives pong ❌ EINVAL on pong receive Expected Behavior The receive() method should successfully return ping and pong frames, or at minimum, handle them internally without throwing an error. The autoReplyPing option should allow automatic pong responses without disrupting the receive loop. Actual Behavior When a ping or pong control frame is received: The receive() method throws NWError.posix(.EINVAL) The frame never reaches user code (no opcode check is possible) The connection remains valid, but the receive loop is interrupted Workaround Catch the EINVAL error and restart the receive loop: while !Task.isCancelled { do { let received = try await connection.receive() // Process message } catch let error as NWError { if case .posix(let code) = error, code == .EINVAL { // Control frame caused EINVAL, continue receiving continue } throw error } } This workaround allows continued operation but: Cannot distinguish between ping-related EINVAL and other EINVAL errors Cannot access the ping/pong frame content Cannot implement custom ping/pong handling Impact WebSocket connections to servers that send periodic pings will experience repeated EINVAL errors Applications must implement workarounds that may mask other legitimate errors Additional Information Packet capture confirms ping/pong frames are correctly transmitted at the network level The error occurs in the Network framework's internal processing, before reaching user code

Hi, I have a VPN product for macOS. When activated, it creates a virtual interface that capture all outgoing traffic for the VPN. the VPN encrypt it, and send it to the tunnel gateway. The gateway then decapsulates the packet and forwards it to the original destination. To achieve this, The vpn modifies the routing table with the following commands: # after packets were encoded with the vpn protocol, re-send them through # the physical interface /sbin/route add -host <tunnel_gateway_address_in_physical_subnet> <default_gateway> -ifp en0 > /dev/null 2>&1 # remove the default rule for en0 and replace it with scoped rule /sbin/route delete default <default_gateway> -ifp en0 > /dev/null 2>&1 /sbin/route add default <default_gateway> -ifscope en0 > /dev/null 2>&1 # create new rule for the virtual interface that will catch all packets # for the vpn /sbin/route add default <tunnel_gateway_address_in_tunnel_subnet> -ifp utunX > /dev/null 2>&1 This works in most cases. However, there are scenarios where the VPN process may crash, stop responding, or another VPN product may alter the routing table. When that happens, packets may no longer go out through the correct interface. Question: Is there a way to reliably reconstruct the routing table from scratch in such scenarios? Ideally, I would like to rebuild the baseline rules for the physical interface (e.g., en0) and then reapply the VPN-specific rules on top. Are there APIs, system utilities, or best practices in macOS for restoring the original routing configuration before reapplying custom VPN routes? Thanks

Hello, We are facing what we believe is a compatibility issue with two networking APIs. If the Network extension VPN configuration has includeAllNetworks flag enabled and the NEHotspotHelper is registered. The user has internet connection but it is blocked, and there user will get internet back only after restarting the device. VPN Configuration is as below while connecting to VPN, { localizedDescription = WLVPN WireGuard Configuration enabled = YES protocolConfiguration = { serverAddress = <18-char-str> passwordReference = {length = 20, bytes = 0x67656e70ed0d05c06b1b4896bf4fef2031e1a92d} disconnectOnSleep = NO includeAllNetworks = YES excludeLocalNetworks = YES excludeCellularServices = YES excludeAPNs = YES excludeDeviceCommunication = YES enforceRoutes = NO providerBundleIdentifier = com.wlvpn.ios.consumervpn.network-extension } onDemandEnabled = NO onDemandRules = () } After running the code shown below. Regardless if the VPN is connected or not, the user needs to restart his device to regain internet access. private let neHelperQueue = DispatchQueue(label: "com.wlvpn.ios.consumervpn.hotspot", attributes: DispatchQueue.Attributes.concurrent) let options: [String: NSObject] = [kNEHotspotHelperOptionDisplayName : "" as NSObject] let status = NEHotspotHelper.register(options: nil, queue: neHelperQueue) { cmd in NSLog("Received command: \(cmd.commandType.rawValue)") } We need to use the includeAllNetworks flag to prevent the novel "Tunnel vision" vulnerability. Can we please have some help getting confirmation if both functionalities are compatible or if there's a way to enable them at the same time?

Dear Apple: In our app, we will call the - (void) applyConfiguration:(NEHotspotConfiguration *) configuration completionHandler:(void (^)(NSError * error)) completionHandler; interface of NEHotspotConfigurationManager on Apple devices. However, we are encountering a problem where the connection to the 2.4G hotspot fails, and the error is nil when it fails. We checked the Wi-Fi air interface and found that the Apple phone does not send a probe request before connecting to the hotspot. However, we are unclear why the Apple device does not send the probe request frame. Could you please help us understand when the probe request frame is not sent during the hotspot connection and how to trigger it to send the probe request frame every time? Thank you.

I'm having a lot of trouble just getting a basic network extension startup, I have a main application that creates the configuration and requests the app extension based network extension to launch. The network extension implements a NEPacketTunnelProvider and the application doesn't receive an error when starting the tunnel but when I inspect the networkextension system logs, I keep getting errors and the network extension itself doesn't appear to start nor does it log anything. log stream --predicate 'subsystem == "com.apple.networkextension"' neagent: (NetworkExtension) [com.apple.networkextension:] Extension request with extension $(BUNDLE_ID) started with identifier (null) neagent: (NetworkExtension) [com.apple.networkextension:] Failed to start extension $(BUNDLE_ID): Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4097 "connection to service named $(BUNDLE_ID)" UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=connection to service named $(BUNDLE_ID)} nesessionmanager: [com.apple.networkextension:] Validation failed - no audit tokens nesessionmanager: [com.apple.networkextension:] NEVPNTunnelPlugin($(BUNDLE_ID)[inactive]): Validation of the extension failed The network extension is written in Objective-C as it needs to integrate with another language. It's not entirely clear what kind of executable the network extension is meant to be, is it meant to have a main entrypoint, or is it supposed to be a shared library / bundle?

Hi! When starting my app which is loading a Content Filter Network Extension I am getting the following error : sysextd: <bundle_id> : extension failed category property check: extensions belonging to the com.apple.system_extension.endpoint_security category require a later version of operating system to launch ... OSSystemExtensionRequest didFailWithError for <bundle_id> : The operation couldn’t be completed. (OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain error 9.) This is happening on a VM running Sonoma 14.7.8. I upgraded the VM to the latest available OS and the system extension is loading just fine. My question is : reading the documentation, I understand that the Network Extensions are supported starting with macOS 10.10+. Why is this not working on my Sonoma 14.7.8 VM?

I haven’t come across any official documentation regarding the limit on the number of Network Extensions macOS can run. However, I did see some discussions suggesting that Apple might restrict this to 5 extensions in macOS Tahoe. Is there any official confirmation on this?

I am using Network framework for connecting two iPad devices that are connected through LAN and has Wifi enabled. I have enabled peerToPeerIncluded. I would like to understand how the framework chooses the interface types for browsing and discovering devices. When I start a browser with browser.run or listener.run, does the browser and advertiser browse and listen on all available interface types? My concern is that if it does in only one interface, Is there a chance that the browser is browsing in one interface(Lets say WiredEthernet) and the listener is listening on another interface(Lets say AWDL) and they dont discover?

Hi, We are trying to use Apple Security API for KeyChain Services. Using the common App Group : Specifying the common app group in the "kSecAttrAccessGroup" field of the KeyChain query, allowed us to have a shared keychains for different apps (targets) in the app group, but this did not work for extensions. Enabling the KeyChain Sharing capability : We enabled the KeyChain Sharing Ability in the extensions and the app target as well, giving a common KeyChain Access group. Specifying this in the kSecAttrAccessGroup field also did not work. This was done in XCode as we were unable to locate it in the Developer portal in Indentifiers. We tried specifying "$AppIdentifier.KeyChainSharingGroup" in the kSecAttrAccessGroup field , but this did not work as well The error code which we get in all these 3 cases when trying to access the Keychain from the extension is error code 25291 (errSecNotAvailable). The Documentation says this error comes when "No Trust Results are available" and printing the error in xcode using the status says "No keychain is available. The online Documentation says that it is possible to share keychain with extensions, but by far we are unable to do it with the methods suggested. Do we need any special entitlement for this or is there something we are missing while using these APIs? We really appreciate any and all help in solving this issue! Thank you

Hi all. Title says it all really. I have an app on MacOS that sends multicast UDP to multiple iOS devices. It shows realtime bar numbers of music played back by a playback software. It was all working until I tried a direct ethernet connection between Mac and phone - a scenario that would be quite common in the theatre world where machines dont have internet connection and people dont rely on wifi. How can I choose which interface my app sends the data through? Here is my connection function: func openConnection() { let params = NWParameters.udp params.allowLocalEndpointReuse = true params.includePeerToPeer = true let endpoint = NWEndpoint.hostPort(host: host, port: port) let conn = NWConnection(to: endpoint, using: params) self.connection = conn conn.stateUpdateHandler = { state in switch state { case .ready: print("Multicast connection ready to \(self.host)") UDPClient.console.log("Multicast connection ready to \(self.host)") case .failed(let error): print("Multicast connection failed: \(error)") default: break } } let udpQueue = DispatchQueue(label: "UDPClientQueue") conn.start(queue: udpQueue) } Thanks for any help in advance!

I have an app with lots of networking calls that are currently done through URLSession. We would like to implement the new carried constrained entitlements and begin moving data through the ultra constrained network path for core features of our application. I have successfully implemented the NWPathMonitor to identify when the current network path is ultra constrained and I have been consistently on a physical device in a real world environment. I'm aware that we will not be able to use URLSession to do this from other posts in this forum like this one. Because of this problem with URLSession I am attempting to fallback to using NWConnection when the current path is ultra constrained. I have setup a NWConnection with the NWParameters.allowUltraConstrainedPaths set to true. The request works perfectly when connected to wifi or cellular. However, it does not work at all when the current path is ultra constrained. When attempting this request through my NWConnection I receive an error that says: The operation couldn’t be completed. (Network.NWError error 50 - Network is down) Is this expected? I have confirmed my physical device is connecting to carrier provided satellite and I have been able to load data in other ios apps from Apple like the music app while on this carrier constrained connection. If this is not the correct way to move data when the path is ultra constrained what is the correct way?

Hi All, I am currently working on a Network Extension App for MacOS using 3 types of extensions provided by Apple's Network Extension Framework. Content Filter, App Proxy (Want to get/capture/log all HTTP/HTTPS traffic), DNS Proxy (Want to get/capture/log all DNS records). Later parse into human readable format. Is my selection of network extension types correct for the intended logs I need? I am able to run with one extension: Main App(Xcode Target1) <-> Content Filter Extension. Here there is a singleton class IPCConnection between App(ViewController.swift) which is working fine with NEMachServiceName from Info.plist of ContentFilter Extension(Xcode Target2) However, when I add an App Proxy extension as a new Xcode Target3, I think the App and extension's communication getting messed up and App not getting started/Crashing. Here, In the same Main App, I am adding new separate IPCConnection for this extension. Here is the project organization/folder structure. MyNetworkExtension ├──MyNetworkExtension(Xcode Target1) │ ├── AppDelegate.swift │ ├── Assets.xcassets │ ├── Info.plist │ ├── MyNetworkExtension.entitlement │ | ── Main │ |-----ViewController.swift │ └── Base.lproj │ └── Main.storyboard ├── ContentFilterExtension(Xcode Target2) │ ├── ContentFilterExtension.entitlement │ │ ├── FilterDataProvider.swift │ │ ├── Info.plist │ │ ├── IPCConnection.swift │ │ └── main.swift ├── AppProxyProviderExtension(Xcode Target3) │ ├── AppProxyProviderExtension.entitlement │ │ ├── AppProxyIPCConnection.swift │ │ ├── AppProxyProvider.swift │ │ ├── Info.plist │ │ └── main.swift └── Frameworks ├── libbsm.tbd └── NetworkExtension.framework Is my Approach for creating a single Network Extension App with Multiple extensions correct or is there any better approach of project organization that will make future modifications/working easier and makes the maintenance better? I want to keep the logic for each extension separate while having the same, single Main App that manages everything(installing, activating, managing identifiers, extensions, etc). What's the best approach to establish a Communication from MainApp to each extension separately, without affecting one another? Is it good idea to establish 3 separate IPC Connections(each is a singleton class) for each extension? Are there any suggestions you can provide that relates to my use case of capturing all the network traffic logs(including HTTP/HTTPS, DNS Records, etc), especially on App to Extension Communication, where my app unable to keep multiple IPC Connections and maintain them separately? I've been working on it for a while, and still unable to make the Network Extension App work with multiple extensions(each as a new Xcode target). Main App with single extension is working fine, but if I add new extension, App getting crashed. I suspect it's due to XPC/IPC connection things! I really appreciate any support on this either directly or by any suggestions/resources that will help me get better understand and make some progress. Please reach out if in case any clarifications or specific information that's needed to better understand my questions. Thank you very much

Hi, after upgrading to MacOS Sequoia, my connection to my local IP address does not work. The issue is with the PF (MacOS advanced firewall), as I confirmed that my local application works disabling it temporarily. Does anyone know how can I do to solve this problem? As APP developer, this is a big problem for me. Thanks in advance.

Hi, On macOS 26.4 Beta (25E5218f) （macOS Tahoe 26 Developer Beta ）, the network filter causes network failures or slowdowns. This manifests as Chrome failing to access websites, while Safari can access the same websites without issue. The affected websites can be pinged locally. My situation is similar to this situation.The same question link is: https://github.com/objective-see/LuLu/issues/836 Have you been paying attention to this issue? Hopefully, it can be fixed in the official release. Thank you.

I'm using NWBrowser to search for a server that I hosted. The browser does find my service but when it tries to connect to it, it gets stuck in the preparing phase in NWConnection.stateUpdateHandler. When I hardcode the local IP address of my computer (where the server is hosted) into NWConnection it works perfectly fine and is able to connect. When it gets stuck in the preparing phase, it gives me the warnings and error messages in the image below. You can also see that the service name is correct and it is found. I have tried _http._tcp and _ssh._tcp types and neither work. This is what my code looks like: func findServerAndConnect(port: UInt16) { print("Searching for server...") let browser = NWBrowser(for: .bonjour(type: "_ssh._tcp", domain: "local."), using: .tcp) browser.browseResultsChangedHandler = { results, _ in print("Found results: \(results)") for result in results { if case let NWEndpoint.service(name, type_, domain, interface) = result.endpoint { if name == "PocketPadServer" { print("Found service: \(name) of type \(type_) in domain \(domain) on interface \(interface)") // Construct the full service name, including type and domain let fullServiceName = "\(name).\(type_).\(domain)" print("Full service name: \(fullServiceName), \(result.endpoint)") self.connect(to: result.endpoint, port: port) browser.cancel() break } } } } browser.start(queue: .main) } func connect(to endpoint: NWEndpoint, port: UInt16) { print("Connecting to \(endpoint) on port \(port)...") // endpoint = NWEndpoint( let tcpParams = NWProtocolTCP.Options() tcpParams.enableFastOpen = true tcpParams.keepaliveIdle = 2 let params = NWParameters(tls: nil, tcp: tcpParams) params.includePeerToPeer = true // connection = NWConnection(host: NWEndpoint.Host("xx.xxx.xxx.xxx"), port: NWEndpoint.Port(3000), using: params) connection = NWConnection(to: endpoint, using: params) connection?.pathUpdateHandler = { path in print("Connection path update: \(path)") if path.status == .satisfied { print("Connection path is satisfied") } else { print("Connection path is not satisfied: \(path.status)") } } connection?.stateUpdateHandler = { newState in DispatchQueue.main.async { switch newState { case .ready: print("Connected to server") self.pairing = true self.receiveMessage() case .failed(let error): print("Connection failed: \(error)") self.isConnected = false case .waiting(let error): print("Waiting for connection... \(error)") self.isConnected = false case .cancelled: print("Connection cancelled") self.isConnected = false case .preparing: print("Preparing connection...") self.isConnected = false default: print("Connection state changed: \(newState)") break } } } connection?.start(queue: .main) }

I'm debugging an app I'm building and everything I'm seeing suggests I need to put in a request to Apple to turn on NetworkExtension → Packet Tunnel Provider entitlement for our Team ID and bundle IDs. 1: Is this true? 2: Doesn't the option in xcode handle this?